Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-05-12 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.33 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is much better than the Motorola Moto G82, having an 83.8 score against 74.7. Even though Galaxy A50 is notably older than Motorola Moto G82, it's design is just a bit thinner and just a bit lighter. Samsung Galaxy A50 features a much powerful processing unit than Moto G82, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Moto G82, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher screen pixel density. Moto G82 captures just a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Moto G82 also counts with higher video frame rates and a much more mega-pixels back facing camera.
The Moto G82 features slightly more memory for applications and games than Galaxy A50, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Moto G82 also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Moto G82 features improved battery duration than Galaxy A50, because it has a 25% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.