Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-05-12 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.33 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| -- | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s has a score of 86.6, which is much better than Moto G82's 74.7 general score. Even though the Galaxy A50s is way older than the Moto G82, it's construction is just a little bit lighter and just a bit thinner. Both phones in this review work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A50s has the previous 10 version and Moto G82 has Android 12 version.
Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a little bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto G82, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a just a little better number of pixels in each inch in the display. The Galaxy A50s has a very superior hardware performance than Moto G82. Both of them have 8 processing cores and the same RAM memory amount.
The Moto G82 has just a bit more storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Moto G82 also has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A50s shoots a bit better photos and videos than Moto G82, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture and a camera with a lower 48 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a lot better (4K) video definition.
Moto G82 features greater battery performance than Galaxy A50s, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.