Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-05-12 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.33 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| -- | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 has a global score of 85.5, which is better than the Moto G82's 74.7 score. These phones include Android operating system, but Galaxy A51 has older 11 version while Moto G82 has Android 12 version. The Galaxy A51 construction has the same thickness than Moto G82, but it is just a little lighter.
Galaxy A51 counts with a little sharper display than Motorola Moto G82, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Galaxy A51 also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen. Galaxy A51 counts with a very superior hardware performance than Moto G82, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Moto G82 features just a bit more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A51, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Moto G82 also has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A51 captures clearer pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G82, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light images and a camera in the back with a lower 48 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a much better (4K) video definition.
Moto G82 features longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.