Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-05-12 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.33 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| -- | Prism cube black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a global score of 90.8, which is a lot better than the Motorola Moto G82's overall score of 74.7. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has the older 11 version while Motorola Moto G82 has Android 12. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is a incredibly older, a bit heavier and just a little thicker cellphone than the Motorola Moto G82.
Galaxy A51 5G counts with a bit better screen than Motorola Moto G82, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a just a little higher pixels quantity in each inch of display. The Galaxy A51 5G features a very superior processing unit than Moto G82. Both have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processing unit.
Motorola Moto G82 counts with a slightly bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto G82 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Moto G82 features just a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
The Galaxy A51 5G features just a bit better camera than Moto G82, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for shooting images or videos in low light environments and a back facing camera with a worse 48 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.