Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2022-05-12 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.33 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a score of 91.3, which is way better than the Motorola Moto G82's overall score of 74.7. Although it's the best we compare here, Samsung Galaxy A52 5G's construction is older, a bit heavier and a bit thicker than Motorola Moto G82. Both of these phones have the same Android 12 OS.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a slightly better display than Motorola Moto G82, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a just a bit higher display density. The Galaxy A52 5G features a way better performance than Moto G82. Both have 6 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processor.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G takes much better photographs and videos than Moto G82, and although they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a lot higher resolution camera and a way higher (4K) video quality. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has as much storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos as the Moto G82, both have a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1 TB and the same 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Motorola Moto G82 has just a little bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.