Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11 |
| 2022-05-12 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.33 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| -- | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52s is way better than Moto G82, having a overall score of 91.1 against 74.7. Even being the best in this review, the Samsung Galaxy A52s is an a little bit heavier and just a bit thicker cellphone than the Moto G82. Both devices in this comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A52s has the previous 11 version and Moto G82 has Android 12.
The Galaxy A52s features a little bit better screen than Motorola Moto G82, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a little more pixels per display inch. The Samsung Galaxy A52s has as much storage capacity for games and applications as the Motorola Moto G82, they have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy A52s counts with a much greater performance than Moto G82. They have a Octa-Core processing unit and 6 GB of RAM memory. Galaxy A52s captures much better pictures and videos than Moto G82, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy A52s also has a way more MP camera and a lot higher video quality.
The Moto G82 has a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy A52s, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.