Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-05-12 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.33 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| -- | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 has a score of 90.8, which is much better than Motorola Moto G82's general score of 74.7. Galaxy Note 20's design is older, just a little thicker and somewhat heavier than the Motorola Moto G82. The Galaxy Note 20 features a very superior processing unit than Motorola Moto G82, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Note 20 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Note 20 features a slightly better display than Moto G82, because although it has a just a little lower quantity of pixels per inch in the display, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the Galaxy Note 20 also counts with a little bigger display. The Moto G82 features a very superior storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Moto G82 also has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1 TB.
Motorola Moto G82 features improved battery duration than Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4300mAh. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20's camera is very similar to the Moto G82 one, because although the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a camera in the back with a much lower resolution, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, it also counts with a lot higher video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.