Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2022-05-12 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.33 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| -- | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a general score of 98.9, which is much better than the Motorola Moto G82's 74.7 score. Both phones we compare here include Android operating system, but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a more recent 13 version while Motorola Moto G82 has Android 12. Despite being the best we compare here, we must note that it's also older, somewhat heavier and a little bit thicker.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a lot better processing power than Moto G82, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a sharper screen than Motorola Moto G82, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3088, a bit bigger display and a little better count of pixels in each inch in the display.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a very superior camera than Motorola Moto G82, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a much better 108 MP resolution back camera and a lot better video resolution. Motorola Moto G82 has a slightly better memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Motorola Moto G82 also has a SD extension slot that supports up to 1 TB.
The Moto G82 has just a little bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has an 11 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.