Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2022-05-12 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.33 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.4 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 is a bit better than Moto G82, having an 81.2 score against 74.7. Both phones we compare here include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note 3 has 5.0 version while Moto G82 has Android 12. The Galaxy Note 3 is a noticeably older and a bit thicker cellphone than the Moto G82, but Samsung managed to build it a bit lighter anyway.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a better looking screen than Motorola Moto G82, although it has a little bit inferior pixel quantity per screen inch, a quite smaller display and a bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution. Moto G82 counts with a very superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note 3, because it has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a very superior processing unit than Moto G82, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and 4 less processing cores , it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor. Motorola Moto G82 has a better camera than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video quality, the Motorola Moto G82 also has a camera in the back with lot more MP, better video frame rates and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better captures and videos in low-light environments.
Moto G82 has a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 56 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.