Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 5.1 |
| 2022-05-12 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.33 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.5 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.12 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.4 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 5 has an overall score of 79.3, which is just a bit better than the Moto G82's 74.7 overall score. Galaxy Note 5's design is a little thinner and just a little lighter than the Moto G82, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. Both devices in our current comparison have Android operating system, but the Galaxy Note 5 has the previous 5.1 version and Moto G82 has Android 12 version.
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 features a much sharper screen than Motorola Moto G82, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a greater screen density. The Moto G82 counts with a lot bigger memory for apps and games than Galaxy Note 5, because it has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 counts with a very superior performance than Motorola Moto G82, although it has lesser RAM memory and less cores. Motorola Moto G82 shoots slightly better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Motorola Moto G82 also has a bigger camera aperture to capture better captures and videos in low-light environments, higher video frame rate and a back camera with a much higher resolution.
The Motorola Moto G82 counts with a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 67% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.