Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-05-12 | 2015-08-21 |
| 6.33 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| -- | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.4 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note5 is just a bit better than Moto G82, getting an 80.2 score against 74.7. Despite of the fact that Galaxy Note5 is a lot older than the Moto G82, it's body is a little bit thinner and just a little lighter. The Galaxy Note5 features a very superior CPU than Moto G82, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Galaxy Note5 features a much better looking screen than Moto G82, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. The Moto G82 has a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Moto G82 shoots clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same video definition, the Motorola Moto G82 also has a way higher 50 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, better 60 frames per second video frame rates and a larger aperture to capture better images in low-light situations.
Moto G82 features a really longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has a 67% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.