Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-05-12 | 2017-09-15 |
| 6.33 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| -- | Deep Sea blue, Maple gold, Midnight black and Orchid gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 440.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note8 has an overall score of 83, which is much better than Moto G82's 74.7 global score. Even being the best device in this comparison, Samsung Galaxy Note8 is an a lot older, a bit thicker and somewhat heavier device than Moto G82. These devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Note8 has 9.0 Pie version and Moto G82 has Android 12.
Samsung Galaxy Note8 counts with a lot better processing power than Moto G82. Both have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM memory amount. Samsung Galaxy Note8 counts with a sharper display than Motorola Moto G82, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better number of pixels per inch of display and a better 1440 x 2960 resolution.
The Moto G82 counts with a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note8, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1 TB. The Moto G82 has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note8, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same (Full HD) video definition, the Moto G82 also counts with better 60 fps video frame rate and a way better resolution back-facing camera.
Moto G82 counts with a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note8, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.