Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-05-12 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.33 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| -- | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10e is better than Moto G82, having a score of 86.3 against 74.7. The Samsung Galaxy S10e construction has the same thickness than Moto G82, but it's somewhat lighter. Samsung Galaxy S10e features a much better processing power than Motorola Moto G82. Both of them have a 6 GB RAM and the same number of cores.
The Galaxy S10e counts with a brighter screen than Moto G82, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2280 and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit higher display pixels density. Motorola Moto G82 has a bit better camera than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for taking pictures or videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Motorola Moto G82 also counts with a much more mega pixels camera in the back.
Motorola Moto G82 features a little bit more memory for games and applications than Galaxy S10e, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Motorola Moto G82 also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1 TB. The Motorola Moto G82 has a much longer battery performance than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 61% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.