Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2022-05-12 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.33 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| -- | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 has a score of 94.8, which is much better than Motorola Moto G82's overall score of 74.7. Samsung Galaxy S20's design has the same thickness than Motorola Moto G82, but it's a bit lighter. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S20 has a newer 13 version while Motorola Moto G82 has Android 12 version.
Samsung Galaxy S20 features a sharper screen than Motorola Moto G82, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher count of pixels per inch of screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3200px. The Samsung Galaxy S20 has a much faster processor than Moto G82, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy S20 shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Motorola Moto G82, because although it has a back-facing camera with much less megapixels, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy S20 also counts with a lot higher video quality. The Motorola Moto G82 features a bit bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S20, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto G82 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1 TB.
The Moto G82 has greater battery lifetime than Galaxy S20, because it has a 25 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.