Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-05-12 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.33 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| -- | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is a lot better than Moto G82, getting a general score of 90.8 against 74.7. Even being the best we are comparing, it must be noted that it's also an older, a little heavier and a little thicker phone. Both phones in this review use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has older 11 version and Moto G82 has Android 12 version.
The Galaxy S20 FE has a way better performance than Motorola Moto G82. Both have 6 GB of RAM and 8 cpu cores. Galaxy S20 FE counts with a bit more vivid display than Moto G82, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Galaxy S20 FE also counts with a little bit higher pixel number in each inch of display.
Moto G82 features a bit bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Moto G82 also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1 TB. Moto G82 features a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Moto G82 takes slightly better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the same video definition and the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, the Moto G82 also has a much more MP back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.