Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2022-05-12 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.33 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| -- | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an overall score of 98, which is a lot better than Motorola Moto G82's general score of 74.7. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a more recent 13 version while Motorola Moto G82 has Android 12 version. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is better than Motorola Moto G82, we must note that it's also an extremely older, somewhat thicker and extremely heavier cellphone.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a lot better performance than Motorola Moto G82, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 6 GB more RAM. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a better looking screen than Moto G82, because it has a little larger screen, a better pixel count in each inch in the display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200.
Moto G82 features a bit more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Moto G82 also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a battery duration that is just as good as Motorola Moto G82's battery life.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures way better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G82, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a way better video quality and a camera with a much higher 108 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.