Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2022-05-12 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.33 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| -- | Blue and Red |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.5 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.67 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 10.4 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S5 Sport has an overall score of 77.8, which is just a bit better than Motorola Moto G82's 74.7 overall score. Galaxy S5 Sport is a way older and thicker phone than the Motorola Moto G82, but Samsung was able to make it just a little bit lighter anyway. Both devices in this review come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy S5 Sport has 4.4.2 version while Motorola Moto G82 has Android 12 version, so it gives you a couple nice extra features.
Galaxy S5 Sport features a much more powerful processing unit than Motorola Moto G82, because although it has lesser cpu cores (although they are faster) and less RAM memory, it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor. Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a way better looking display than Motorola Moto G82, because although it has a really smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px, it also counts with a quite greater display density.
Moto G82 counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has more internal storage capacity and a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Motorola Moto G82 has a very superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 79% larger battery capacity.
The Moto G82 shoots slightly better photos and videos than Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Moto G82 also has a bigger diafragm aperture, faster video frame rates and a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.