Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-05-12 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.33 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 is a little bit better than Moto G82, getting a overall score of 79.5 against 74.7. The Galaxy S7 construction has the same thickness than the Moto G82, but it's lighter. Samsung Galaxy S7 features an extremely better processing unit than Moto G82, although it has a smaller amount of RAM and a lower number of cores (but faster).
The Galaxy S7 has an incredibly better looking screen than Moto G82, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a greater screen density. The Moto G82 takes slightly better pictures and videos than Galaxy S7, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video resolution, the Moto G82 also counts with higher video frame rate and a much more megapixels back camera.
The Moto G82 counts with a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has 96 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Motorola Moto G82 features a very superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a 67 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.