Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2022-05-12 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.33 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| -- | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.4 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 edge has an overall score of 78.1, which is a bit better than the Moto G82's global score of 74.7. Galaxy S7 edge is an incredibly older cellphone than Moto G82, but it is just a little lighter and a bit thinner anyway. Both phones we compare here use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S7 edge has the newer 8.0 Oreo version while Moto G82 has Android 12, providing some nice extra features.
Galaxy S7 edge counts with a sharper display than Moto G82, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a greater screen density. Galaxy S7 edge has a way better hardware performance than Moto G82, although it has a lower amount of RAM and 4 less processing cores.
Moto G82 features a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has 96 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that admits up to 1 TB. Motorola Moto G82 counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low light photography and videos, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Motorola Moto G82 also counts with a camera in the back with a way better resolution and faster 60 fps video frame rates.
Moto G82 has a much longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.