Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-05-12 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.33 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| -- | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 has an overall score of 83.3, which is better than the Moto G82's 74.7 general score. Even though the Galaxy S9 is incredibly older and a little bit thicker than the Moto G82, it's design is still just a little bit lighter. Samsung Galaxy S9 has a much more powerful processor than Moto G82, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy S9 has a sharper screen than Moto G82, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2960 resolution and a greater pixel amount in each display inch. Motorola Moto G82 counts with a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S9, because it has 128 GB internal storage and an external memory slot that supports up to 1 TB.
The Motorola Moto G82 has just a bit better camera than Galaxy S9, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low light photos, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Motorola Moto G82 also counts with a back camera with way more mega-pixels.
Moto G82 counts with a much better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.