Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11 |
| 2022-05-12 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.33 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| -- | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 10.67 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.4 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 3 is way better than the Moto G82, getting a 90.6 score against 74.7. Both of these devices use Android OS, but Galaxy Z Fold 3 has older 11 version and Moto G82 has Android 12. Galaxy Z Fold 3's body is somewhat thinner than the Moto G82, but it is heavier and was released just 9 months before.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a much faster processing unit than Moto G82, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a little sharper screen than Motorola Moto G82, because although it has a little less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a better 1768 x 2208 resolution and a bigger screen.
The Moto G82 has a way better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a way more megapixels back-facing camera and a bigger aperture. Motorola Moto G82 counts with a quite bigger memory for apps and games than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1 TB.
Motorola Moto G82 has a bit better battery performance than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.