Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-05-12 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.33 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| -- | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a general score of 79, which is a little bit better than Moto G82's 74.7 general score. Although it's the best in this comparison review, we must tell that it is also a much older, somewhat heavier and thicker cellphone. Both phones we are comparing use Android operating system, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has older 11 version and Moto G82 has Android 12 version.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a way better performance than Moto G82, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a bit better looking screen than Moto G82, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch in the display, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also counts with a little larger display.
The Motorola Moto G82 counts with much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S takes a bit better videos and photos than Moto G82, because although it has a lower 48 megapixels resolution back camera, and they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also counts with a much higher (4K) video quality.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a battery performance that's very similar to the Motorola Moto G82 one, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a 5020mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.