Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-09-14 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| -- | 5.57 ounces |
| Marshmallow Blue, Midnight Blue and Viva Magenta | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has an overall score of 81.3, which is slightly better than the Motorola Moto G84's global score of 80.9. The Motorola Moto G84 counts with a little sharper screen than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a little less pixels per inch in the display and a way worse 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, it also counts with a quite larger display.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a very superior CPU than Moto G84, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Motorola Moto G84 captures much clearer photographs and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low light photos, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Motorola Moto G84 also counts with a lot bigger sensor shooting much higher quality videos and photographs, higher 60 frames per second video frame rates and a lot higher 50 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a quite bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola Moto G84, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Moto G84 has a very superior battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.