Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 13 | Android 10 |
| 2023-09-14 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 5.96 ounces |
| Marshmallow Blue, Midnight Blue and Viva Magenta | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ has a general score of 81.2, which is a little bit better than the Moto G84's score of 80.9. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but the LG V40 ThinQ has 10 version while Moto G84 has Android 13 version. LG V40 ThinQ is a much heavier cellphone than the Moto G84, but both are equally thin.
Motorola Moto G84 counts with a little sharper screen than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a little lower display density and a much lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a quite larger screen. LG V40 ThinQ counts with a much powerful processing unit than Motorola Moto G84, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The LG V40 ThinQ has more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G84, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB. Moto G84 captures better pictures and videos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a way tinier aperture which is not nice for taking photos and video in low-light environments, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (Full HD) video quality, the Moto G84 also counts with a camera in the back with lot more MP and a much larger sensor.
The Motorola Moto G84 has a really longer battery performance than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.