Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-09-14 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 5.86 ounces |
| Marshmallow Blue, Midnight Blue and Viva Magenta | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is slightly better than the Moto G84, getting an 83.8 score against 80.9. The Galaxy A50 is a notably heavier phone than Moto G84, but both are 0.3inches thick. The Galaxy A50 features a much better performing CPU than Moto G84, although it has 8 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Moto G84 features a sharper display than Galaxy A50, because it has a just a bit greater screen density, a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a quite larger display. The Galaxy A50 features a bit bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Moto G84, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB.
Motorola Moto G84 counts with longer battery performance than Galaxy A50, because it has a 25% more battery size. Moto G84 shoots much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same video quality, the Moto G84 also counts with higher video frame rates, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality photographs and a much better resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.