Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2023-09-14 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 5.86 ounces |
| Marshmallow Blue, Midnight Blue and Viva Magenta | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s has an overall score of 86.6, which is a bit better than Moto G84's 80.9 score. Both phones in this comparison review have Android operating system, but Galaxy A50s has an older 10 version and Moto G84 has Android 13. The Galaxy A50s is a much heavier phone than Moto G84, but they are 0.3inches thick.
The Moto G84 features a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a little larger screen, a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a bit greater pixels number in each inch in the screen. Galaxy A50s counts with a slightly bigger storage for games and applications than Moto G84, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds up to 512 GB.
Galaxy A50s counts with a much powerful CPU than Moto G84, although it has 6 GB less RAM, they both have 8 cores. Moto G84 features improved battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. The Galaxy A50s takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Moto G84, because although it has a less mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, a smaller aperture which is not recommended for shooting pictures and/or video in low light situations and a much tinier sensor, it also counts with a much higher video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.