Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-09-14 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| -- | 6.60 ounces |
| Marshmallow Blue, Midnight Blue and Viva Magenta | Prism cube black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G has an overall score of 90.8, which is much better than the Motorola Moto G84's 80.9 overall score. Both devices we compare here include Android operating system, but Galaxy A51 5G has older 11 version while Motorola Moto G84 has Android 13 version. The Moto G84 features a sharper display than Galaxy A51 5G. Both of them have a higher amount of pixels per display inch, a screen with the same size and the same 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Galaxy A51 5G has a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Moto G84, although it has less RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than Moto G84, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1000 GB.
The Moto G84 features a little longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh. The Galaxy A51 5G takes a bit better photos and videos than Motorola Moto G84, because although it has a much smaller sensor which provides a lot lower image and video quality, a tinier aperture and a worse 48 mega-pixels resolution camera, it also counts with a much higher (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.