Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2023-09-14 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| -- | 9.74 ounces |
| Marshmallow Blue, Midnight Blue and Viva Magenta | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is much better than Motorola Moto G84, having a overall score of 97.6 against 80.9. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy Fold has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and Motorola Moto G84 has Android 13 version. The Moto G84 has a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit higher count of pixels per inch of screen.
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a much faster CPU than Moto G84. They have a 12 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores. Galaxy Fold features a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G84, because it has more internal memory. The Motorola Moto G84 captures better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a much smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography and videos, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Moto G84 also counts with a lot more mega-pixels back camera and a much bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Moto G84 features a little better battery life than Galaxy Fold, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4380mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.