Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2023-09-14 | 2019-06-18 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.93 ounces |
| Marshmallow Blue, Midnight Blue and Viva Magenta | Midnight blue and Seawater blue |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M40 is just a bit better than the Moto G84, with a score of 85 against 80.9. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy M40 has an older 10 version and Moto G84 has Android 13 version. Motorola Moto G84 counts with a better looking screen than Galaxy M40, because although it has a just a little worse number of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a quite larger screen and a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy M40 counts with a really superior performance than Motorola Moto G84, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Galaxy M40 has a slightly better storage capacity to store more games and applications than Moto G84, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 512 GB.
Moto G84 takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy M40, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same (Full HD) video definition, the Moto G84 also counts with better video frame rate, a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera and a way larger back camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
The Moto G84 features a very superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy M40, because it has a 43% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.