Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 5.1 |
| 2023-09-14 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 6.03 ounces |
| Marshmallow Blue, Midnight Blue and Viva Magenta | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Plastic | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G84 has a general score of 80.9, which is a little bit better than Galaxy Note 5's 79.3 general score. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS, but Motorola Moto G84 has 13 version and Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1 version. The Galaxy Note 5 counts with a much powerful processor than Moto G84, although it has a smaller amount of RAM and less cores (although they are faster).
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 features a little bit better screen than Moto G84, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels. The Moto G84 counts with a way bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Motorola Moto G84 has a very superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Moto G84 captures much better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have a F1.9 diafragm aperture and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Moto G84 also has a camera with a lot higher 50 megapixels resolution, a way bigger sensor shooting way higher quality videos and pictures and higher 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.