Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2023-09-14 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.54 ounces |
| Marshmallow Blue, Midnight Blue and Viva Magenta | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 has a score of 88.3, which is a little bit better than the Moto G84's 80.9 general score. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S10 has the previous 11 version and Moto G84 has Android 13. Galaxy S10 counts with a very superior hardware performance than Moto G84, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores.
Moto G84 features a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has a lot less pixels per screen inch and a much lower resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen. Samsung Galaxy S10 features a bit bigger memory to install games and applications than Motorola Moto G84, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 512 GB.
The Moto G84 shoots much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has a lot smaller aperture, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution and the same 60 fps video frame rates, the Moto G84 also counts with a lot larger back camera sensor taking lot higher quality photographs and videos and a camera with much more megapixels.
The Moto G84 has a way better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S10, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.