Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-09-14 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 6.56 ounces |
| Marshmallow Blue, Midnight Blue and Viva Magenta | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 Lite is better than the Motorola Moto G84, getting an 89.7 score against 80.9. Moto G84 counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Moto G84 also counts with a little greater pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Moto G84, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a really superior performance than Motorola Moto G84, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Moto G84 has just a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh. The Galaxy S10 Lite captures slightly better videos and photos than Moto G84, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light images and videos, a much smaller back camera sensor capturing lot lower quality images and videos and a back-facing camera with less mega pixels, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.