Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2023-09-14 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.78 ounces |
| Marshmallow Blue, Midnight Blue and Viva Magenta | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 is much better than the Motorola Moto G84, having a score of 94.8 against 80.9. Both of these phones come with the same Android 13 operating system, so both should give all the same operating system features. Moto G84 counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy S20, because although it has much lesser pixels per display inch and a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a little bigger display.
Samsung Galaxy S20 has an extremely better processor than Motorola Moto G84. Both have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 12 GB RAM memory. The Galaxy S20 has a greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto G84, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1000 GB.
The Motorola Moto G84 captures clearer photos and videos than Galaxy S20, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same (Full HD) video quality, the Motorola Moto G84 also counts with a back camera with a lot better resolution, a bigger sensor shooting higher quality videos and pictures and faster 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Moto G84 counts with better battery performance than Galaxy S20, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.