Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-09-14 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.70 ounces |
| Marshmallow Blue, Midnight Blue and Viva Magenta | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a global score of 90.8, which is much better than the Moto G84's general score of 80.9. Both devices we compare here work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has older 11 version and Moto G84 has Android 13. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a very superior CPU than Motorola Moto G84, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores.
The Motorola Moto G84 counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy S20 FE. Both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, a display with the same size and the same pixel density. Moto G84 takes just a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low light captures and video, and they both have the same 60 fps video frame rates and the same video quality, the Moto G84 also counts with a back camera with much more mega-pixels and a bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy S20 FE counts with a bigger memory to install games and applications than Motorola Moto G84, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1000 GB. The Moto G84 counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.