Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2023-09-14 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 5.57 ounces |
| Marshmallow Blue, Midnight Blue and Viva Magenta | Blue and Red |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.33 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 10.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Moto G84 is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, with an 80.9 score against 77.8. Both of these devices work with Android OS (operating system), but the Moto G84 has older 13 version while Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2. The Moto G84 design is much newer, thinner and lighter than the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport.
The Galaxy S5 Sport counts with an extremely better processing unit than Motorola Moto G84, because although it has an inferior number of cores (but faster) and 10 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit. The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a bit sharper screen than Motorola Moto G84, because although it has a really smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, it also counts with a just a little higher display density.
Motorola Moto G84 captures much better photographs and videos than Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola Moto G84 also has a bigger aperture to capture better low-light images, a much more MP back-facing camera, higher video frame rate and a much larger back-facing camera sensor.
The Motorola Moto G84 has a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Moto G84 counts with a much longer battery performance than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.