Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-09-14 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.36 ounces |
| Marshmallow Blue, Midnight Blue and Viva Magenta | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Moto G84 is a bit better than the Galaxy S7, having a overall score of 80.9 against 79.5. The Moto G84 is a extremely newer cellphone, and it's also a bit thinner and notably lighter than Galaxy S7. Galaxy S7 counts with just a bit better display than Moto G84, because although it has way darker display and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a greater display density.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 counts with a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Moto G84, although it has 8 GB lesser RAM memory and less CPU cores. The Motorola Moto G84 features much more memory to install games and applications than Galaxy S7, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
Moto G84 shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for shooting photographs or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Moto G84 also counts with a way bigger sensor providing a lot higher image quality, a back facing camera with way more megapixels and faster 60 fps video frame rate.
The Moto G84 has a really longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a 67 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.