Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-09-14 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| -- | 6.53 ounces |
| Marshmallow Blue, Midnight Blue and Viva Magenta | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | HSPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Moto G84 is a little bit better than Galaxy S7 Active, getting a overall score of 80.9 against 75.8. Moto G84 is a notably newer phone, and it is also notably lighter and a lot thinner than the Galaxy S7 Active. Samsung Galaxy S7 Active features an extremely better processing unit than Moto G84, although it has a smaller amount of RAM and a lower number of cores (but faster).
The Galaxy S7 Active has a slightly better looking screen than Moto G84, because although it has a really smaller screen and a lot more opaque display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a greater screen density. The Moto G84 takes much better pictures and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video resolution, the Moto G84 also counts with higher video frame rate and a much more megapixels back camera.
The Moto G84 counts with a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory capacity. The Motorola Moto G84 features greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 25 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.