Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-09-14 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| -- | 7.76 ounces |
| Marshmallow Blue, Midnight Blue and Viva Magenta | Black |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto G84, with a overall score of 81 against 80.9. These devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has the older 11 version and Motorola Moto G84 has Android 13. Galaxy XCover Pro features a way better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G84, although it has 8 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Moto G84 counts with a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little inferior quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little bigger display. Motorola Moto G84 counts with a greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Motorola Moto G84 has longer battery performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4050mAh. The Motorola Moto G84 has a superior camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Motorola Moto G84 also counts with a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing much better quality photographs and videos and higher video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.