Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2023-09-14 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| -- | 6.46 ounces |
| Marshmallow Blue, Midnight Blue and Viva Magenta | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is a little bit better than the Moto G84, getting an 88.5 score against 80.9. Both of these devices include Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Flip has 12 version while Moto G84 has Android 13 version. Motorola Moto G84 has a bit better looking display than Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a little bit smaller screen, a little bit inferior pixel quantity in each screen inch and a quite lower 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with an extremely better processor than Motorola Moto G84, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Moto G84 and Galaxy Z Flip have similar memory for games and applications, both of them have exactly the same internal memory capacity.
Motorola Moto G84 features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Motorola Moto G84 also counts with a lot higher 50 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera and a lot larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Moto G84 has a much better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.