Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-09-14 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| -- | 9.95 ounces |
| Marshmallow Blue, Midnight Blue and Viva Magenta | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is better than Moto G84, having a global score of 94.6 against 80.9. These phones use Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the previous 11 version and Moto G84 has Android 13. Motorola Moto G84 features a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a quite better pixel quantity in each display inch.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 and Moto G84 feature very similar memory for applications and games, they have exactly the same 256 GB internal storage. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a very superior processing power than Moto G84. Both have a 12 GB RAM and 8 cores. Moto G84 shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same (Full HD) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Moto G84 also counts with a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a much better 50 megapixels resolution back camera.
Motorola Moto G84 counts with a little longer battery duration than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has an 11 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.