Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-28 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Forest green and Sapphire blue | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has a general score of 81.9, which is just a bit better than the Moto G9 Play's 76.7 overall score. The Google Pixel 4 is an older phone than the Moto G9 Play, but Google made it somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter anyway. Google Pixel 4 features a better screen than Moto G9 Play, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a lot better 1080 x 2280 pixels resolution and a much higher display pixels density.
The Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Moto G9 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Google Pixel 4 also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Motorola Moto G9 Play features a way bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto G9 Play also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB.
Motorola Moto G9 Play counts with a superior camera than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video definition and a same size aperture, the Motorola Moto G9 Play also has a lot bigger camera sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality, higher video frame rate and a way more megapixels back-facing camera.
The Moto G9 Play has a very superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 79% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.