Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-28 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Forest green and Sapphire blue | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL has an overall score of 82.9, which is a bit better than Moto G9 Play's 76.7 general score. Google Pixel 4 XL's construction is just a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner than the Moto G9 Play, even though it was released only 10 months before. Google Pixel 4 XL features a way better looking display than Motorola Moto G9 Play, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much better 1440 x 3040 resolution and a lot greater number of pixels per inch in the screen.
The Moto G9 Play has a superior memory to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Moto G9 Play also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Google Pixel 4 XL has a little faster processor than Moto G9 Play, and although they both have 8 cores, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Moto G9 Play features a superior camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition and a F1.7 aperture, the Moto G9 Play also has a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution camera in the back, higher 60 frames per second video frame rate and a lot bigger sensor shooting much better quality videos and pictures.
The Motorola Moto G9 Play features improved battery life than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 35% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.