Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-08-28 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Forest green and Sapphire blue | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G7 ThinQ has a score of 81, which is a little bit better than the Moto G9 Play's 76.7 global score. Both phones in this review come with Android OS (operating system), but the LG G7 ThinQ has newer 9.0 Pie version and Moto G9 Play has Android 10, counting with lots of additional features and some performance improvements. Despite of the fact that the LG G7 ThinQ is extremely older than Moto G9 Play, it's design is lighter and somewhat thinner.
LG G7 ThinQ has an incredibly better screen than Moto G9 Play, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a way greater screen pixels density and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px. LG G7 ThinQ features a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Moto G9 Play, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the LG G7 ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The LG G7 ThinQ features just a bit better performance than Motorola Moto G9 Play. They have a 4 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit. The Moto G9 Play has a slightly better camera than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Moto G9 Play also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor taking way better quality photographs and a lot more megapixels back camera.
Moto G9 Play features a very superior battery performance than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 67% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.