Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-28 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Forest green and Sapphire blue | Black and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a general score of 81.3, which is slightly better than the Motorola Moto G9 Play's 76.7 global score. Despite of the fact that LG V35 ThinQ is much older than Motorola Moto G9 Play, it's body is somewhat thinner and incredibly lighter. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much more vibrant screen than Moto G9 Play, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot greater display pixels density and a lot higher 1440 x 2880 resolution.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Moto G9 Play, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ has a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G9 Play, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM.
The Motorola Moto G9 Play features a really longer battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3300mAh. Motorola Moto G9 Play has a much better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for shooting images in low light environments, and they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Motorola Moto G9 Play also counts with a lot larger back camera sensor, a camera with way more megapixels and faster video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.