Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-08-28 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Forest green and Sapphire blue | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is much better than Moto G9 Play, getting a overall score of 87.1 against 76.7. These phones have Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has newer 14 version while Moto G9 Play has Android 10 version. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra construction is notably newer, a little bit lighter and just a little bit thinner than the Moto G9 Play.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a lot better looking screen than Moto G9 Play, because it has a little bit larger screen, more pixels per inch of display and a much better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. Motorola Moto G9 Play features a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Moto G9 Play, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto G9 Play, because it has a back camera with a better 50 mega-pixels resolution, a way better video definition, a larger camera aperture to take better low-light photos and video and a lot larger back camera sensor taking way better quality pictures.
Moto G9 Play counts with a bit better battery performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.