Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-08-28 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Forest green and Sapphire blue | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A41 has a score of 81.7, which is a little bit better than Motorola Moto G9 Play's overall score of 76.7. The Samsung Galaxy A41 body is thinner and extremely lighter than Motorola Moto G9 Play, even when both were released only 4 months apart. Both phones we compare here include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A41 has a newer 11 version and Motorola Moto G9 Play has Android 10, providing the user some nice extra features.
The Samsung Galaxy A41 has a much better looking display than Motorola Moto G9 Play, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a much higher display pixels density. Moto G9 Play and Galaxy A41 count with quite similar processing units, they have a 4 GB RAM and 8 CPU cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A41 captures a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G9 Play, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor taking less light and duller colors and a smaller aperture which is not so good for shooting pictures or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have a same resolution back camera, the Samsung Galaxy A41 also counts with a lot better (4K) video definition.
The Galaxy A41's memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos is very similar to Moto G9 Play's one, both have exactly the same internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola Moto G9 Play features a much longer battery life than Galaxy A41, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.