Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-08-28 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Forest green and Sapphire blue | Prism cube black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 5G has a global score of 90.8, which is much better than the Motorola Moto G9 Play's score of 76.7. Galaxy A51 5G is a just a little bit lighter and just a bit thinner phone than the Motorola Moto G9 Play, even though both of them were released only a couple months apart. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A51 5G has newer 11 version while Motorola Moto G9 Play has Android 10.
The Galaxy A51 5G has a more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G9 Play, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a lot better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a higher pixels density. Galaxy A51 5G counts with a little better hardware performance than Moto G9 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto G9 Play, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Motorola Moto G9 Play counts with a bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G captures a little bit better pictures and videos than Moto G9 Play, because although it has a smaller camera sensor which provides a lower photo and video quality and a tinier aperture, and they both have a same resolution camera, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.