Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-28 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Forest green and Sapphire blue | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 has an overall score of 90.7, which is much better than Motorola Moto G9 Play's 76.7 overall score. Even when the Galaxy A52 and Motorola Moto G9 Play were released with only a couple of months difference, the Galaxy A52 is a little bit lighter and just a bit thinner. Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a little faster processing unit than Moto G9 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A52 counts with a better display than Motorola Moto G9 Play, and although they both have a same size display, the Galaxy A52 also has a higher pixel amount in each inch of screen and a much better 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A52 features a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Moto G9 Play, because it has a SD extension slot that supports up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory.
Motorola Moto G9 Play features just a little better battery duration than Galaxy A52, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4500mAh. The Galaxy A52 takes slightly better photographs and videos than Moto G9 Play, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low light photos and video, and they both have a 0.59 inches camera sensor, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video quality and a back camera with lot more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.