Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-08-28 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Forest green and Sapphire blue | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G has a general score of 91.3, which is much better than the Motorola Moto G9 Play's 76.7 overall score. These phones include Android OS, but Galaxy A52 5G has the newer 12 version and Motorola Moto G9 Play has Android 10 version. Galaxy A52 5G's construction is just a bit thinner and a little bit lighter than Motorola Moto G9 Play, even though both were released only a couple of months apart.
Galaxy A52 5G counts with a bit better processor than Moto G9 Play, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a better looking screen than Motorola Moto G9 Play, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a lot higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a greater pixel density.
The Galaxy A52 5G features a lot bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Moto G9 Play, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1 TB. Motorola Moto G9 Play has just a bit longer battery life than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has an 11 percent greater battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G captures a bit better videos and photos than Motorola Moto G9 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for taking images and videos in low light situations, and they both have a same size back-facing camera sensor, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a way more MP back camera and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.