Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-28 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Forest green and Sapphire blue | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52s has a general score of 91.1, which is much better than Motorola Moto G9 Play's 76.7 general score. Galaxy A52s is a newer phone, and it's also a little lighter and just a little thinner than the Motorola Moto G9 Play. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS, but Galaxy A52s has the newer 11 version and Motorola Moto G9 Play has Android 10.
The Galaxy A52s features a better looking screen than Motorola Moto G9 Play, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Galaxy A52s also has a higher screen density and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The Galaxy A52s counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola Moto G9 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A52s also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy A52s captures slightly better videos and photos than Moto G9 Play, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for capturing pictures and video in poorly lited environments, and they both have a 0.59 inches back-facing camera sensor, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a back facing camera with a way better resolution.
The Galaxy A52s counts with much more storage capacity for games and applications than Moto G9 Play, because it has a SD card slot that allows up to 1 TB and more internal memory capacity. The Moto G9 Play features a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy A52s, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.